Enduring Love (Transcript) Originally broadcast November 5, 2004
Milos Stehlik
Listen to Milos Stehlik's Commentary
The opening scene of Roger Michell’s new film, Enduring Love, is a harrowing image. It’s the stuff nightmares are made
of. On a perfect summer day, a loving couple go out on a picnic. We know that Joe is about to propose to Claire. Nearby is a
hot air balloon. It is an idyllic scene. A sudden gust of wind makes it take off, with a boy left alone in the basket. Four
men, including Joe, rush to the rescue. They grasp at the ropes which had secured the balloon, but are born aloft. One by one
they let go. The man who hangs on the longest eventually falls to the ground and is killed.
Another of the men involved in the rescue, Jed, latches onto Joe and starts stalking him. He sees divine intervention in
their being brought together. The plot gradually evolves into ever-more bizarre territory.
Enduring Love is based on a novel by Ian McEwan. It is a thriller but it doesn’t try to deliver on the suspense front.
Instead, McEwan and Michell choose to explore the interior territory of the murky subject of love and attachment.
Enduring Love is especially notable for its impeccable acting. Daniel Craig plays Joe, the college professor who
lectures about how love is scientifically meaningless. Samantha Morton plays Claire, his girlfriend who is a sculptor. Rhys
Ifans is brilliantly creepy as Jed, the stalker who is obviously unbalanced and slowly going insane.
The balloon accident is central to the film. It sparks the connection between Joe and Jed, and it begins the unraveling of
Joe and Claire’s relationship. Jed, who is disheveled, with huge, glazed blue eyes, on the verge of tears—a kind of
earnest zealot—is a dark angel. He suddenly appears in a park opposite Joe’s apartment window in the rain then at a
bookstore. At first, he just wants to talk. The two share a terrifying experience and they are both survivors, with
survivors’ guilt. A trauma brought them together.
But we soon realize there is something much more demented and sinister at work. Jed’s obsession with Joe has a sexual element
to it. Its intensity is downright creepy. Jed is overly adoring, thoughtful, needful, constantly expressive of his love for
Joe. He badgers Joe with, “You can’t live your life in denial....I think you know me better than you think....Everything
means something....”
The point of this obsessive intensity for us is that it makes us uncomfortable. It is unsettling. There is something else to
it than what Joe professes in his classes: love is not, purely, scientifically, biological. It has a psychic—or
psychopathic—dimension.
Enduring Love concludes with a more traditional, thriller-style sequence. Some who see the film criticize this as
being out of character, as being artificial. But regardless of the perhaps over-constructed ending, the virtues of
Enduring Love as a film are in the process that gets us there—in the contrasts and contradictions of the bizarre
interior universe that the film and the novel reveal. The film probes the nature of love and attachment. What is it? What
creates it? What makes it so powerful? What unmakes it? What is its power? Where are the weaknesses? What makes it collapse?
Where are the fissures or cracks that develop along the way? Why is it capable of destroying us?
There are no easy answers to these questions. Philosophers, psychologists, and everyone who has ever been in love or out of
it has confronted them. What Enduring Love does best is to convincingly set these questions in the context of extreme
situations. Here we come intensely, intimately, and viscerally face to face with it.
This is Milos Stehlik for Chicago Public Radio’s Worldview.
Worldview film contributor Milos Stehlik is the director of Facets Multimedia.